We’re available for advice on children’s human rights on email at inbox@cypcs.org.uk and on freephone at 0800 019 1179.

We're experiencing a high number of enquiries at the moment so there may be some delay in our response, but we will reply as soon as we can.

Strategic litigation


Strategic litigation is a way to use the law to improve human rights for children and young people.

A:

There are times when a case in a court of law can impact more than just the people directly involved in it. The court’s decision may affect other children and young people’s rights by establishing an important point of law or principle. That means that other cases might use this point of law or principle in the future.

When a case like this comes up, the Commissioner may ask the court’s permission to intervene— become involved. When they do this, the Commissioner doesn’t take sides or represent children directly. Instead, they bring issues about children’s rights to the court’s attention to help the judge make a good decision. Doing this is a way of doing strategic litigation.

What strategic litigation have we taken on?

In 2018 and 2019 we were given leave to intervene – were allowed to become involved – in two cases involving the rights of children and young people.

Case 1

The first case involved children whose parents were not allowed to receive benefits because of their immigration status. After we became involved, the case was resolved, out of court.

Our intervention in the case revolved around the condition of no recourse to public funds, which we highlighted as a breach of children’s human rights in our first legal briefing. This briefing informs and provides human rights defenders with the tools necessary to advocate and challenge on behalf of children and young people.

Case 2

In the second case, we asked the Court of Session in Edinburgh to allow us to intervene in a case involving a child who was being deprived of their liberty in a residential children’s house.

The child had been placed in a children’s care home in Scotland by the High Court of England and Wales without a Scottish legal order being in place.

The child was under constant supervision, in a different country, with very limited access to her family and friends and this was a breach of her human rights. The Commissioner was allowed to intervene in the case as they are concerned there may be other children and young people in a similar situation. The case concluded when the child was returned to England.

A:

The Court of Session is the highest civil court in Scotland.

What this means

When a judge makes a decision in a civil court it can be appealed in a civil court that has more authority, who can decide the judge’s decision was wrong. But then their decision can also be appealed in a civil court with more authority than that.

The highest civil court is the one with the most authority of all. Once they make a decision, it can only be appealed to the UK Supreme Court, and only in some circumstances.

Case 3

In 2019, following the publication of our report into restraint and seclusion in Scotland’s schools, the Commissioner worked with the Equality and Human Rights Commission Scotland who supported a Judicial Review against the Scottish Government.

top